Maia’s Debate or Dodon’s Deviation?

Maia’s Debate or Dodon’s Deviation?
14 November 2020 | 19:03

The 2020 Moldova presidential debates between Maia Sandu and Igor Dodon, the major candidates in the presidential election, didn’t take place. Depressing autumn weather, coronavirus pandemic,  country’s poverty- who needs debates in such conditions? It’s as if we haven’t all heard, dozens of times, what is each of them supposed to say? This is the vision for the last round of presidential debates this year.

There is a growing body of opinion that debates should be prescribed by law. Debates mean access to information about candidates and define their respective positions. This is one of the main reasons why debates should be legislatively mandated.

This year there was no presidential debate in Moldova. Let’s assume that the debate did take place. It would look worse and more dramatically than it was in  the 2016 debate between the same two presidential candidates. First, Dodon would show off his male sexual supremacy, alluding to Sandu’s marital status and lack of children. He would then poke fun at her studies at Harvard University and make jokes about her experience in several important offices in Washington. Finally, he would attack her unscrupulously with his favorite manipulations: LGBTQ and unionism with Romania, covering himself from top to bottom in the piety of a president who walked around Mount Athos. 

 Igor Dodon would have allegedly attacked Maia Sandu unorthodoxly in a debate. She decided to become president, show resilience, and show society her ability to respond under pressure. Human beings love the instant reactions in unpredictable situations. Following this, not only presidential candidates but also parliamentarians, ministers, mayors should be subjected to such an attempt at spontaneity.

The debates also highlighted Maia Sandu’s ability to ask questions. Here, the list had to be large and heavy: about corruption, lack of judicial reforms, huge expenditures, lack of official reports, one-billion-dollar theft. However, Igor Dodon’s answers would have been the ones he has been shouting constantly for the last four years: “That’s all”, “I don’t remember”, “Don’t deal with fakes”. All this, mixed with sexist attacks, naughty jokes, disgusting approaches, and degrading allusions. Moreover, there is the propaganda machine: owning pro-Russian television channels, webpages, armies of trolls on social networks to have diverted the public’s attention from the non-answers regarding corruption to sexist approaches and that would be all that was left to the Moldovan society.

Why did not Maia Sandu accept the debate, though? Was her refusal proof of weakness or a skillful step to get around the mud throwers? Though, a more significant question for all of the Moldovan citizens: How did we, as a society, get to this point where poorly educated people, with limited professional experience, full of contradictions and corruption, with the resume filled with immorality, ruled almost everything in this state? Should we confront them in public talks, lower our standards to the level of their illiteracy, let them drag us through the mud instead of answering our questions? How do we land in such situations?

Should the Moldovan society give up debate? Not in any way. We need to turn the debates into a platform where issues of the most significant public interest are discussed and, where it is punishable to ridicule public affairs through insinuation, speculation, and use of the electorate fears against certain topics that we have been intoxicated with for 30 years.

The ideal debate would be one in which only investigative journalists ask questions, and the debate is broadcast live on all TV channels, including oligarchic and candidate-controlled ones, but primarily on public television.

AUTHOR MAIL

 .

Former Minister of Defense Detained in a Case Related to the Godson of the Runaway Oligarch Vladimir Plahotniuc

The former Minister of Defense in the Chicu Government, Alexandru Pînzari, was detained this morning by the officers of the Information and Security Service. He is investigated in the case related to Dorin Dami…
Former Minister of Defense Detained in a Case Related to the Godson of the Runaway Oligarch Vladimir Plahotniuc

The Shor Party Deputy’s Case in the Billion-Dollar Bank Fraud was Sent to Court

The Anticorruption Prosecutor’s Office sent to court the criminal case in which the deputy of the Shor Paty, Denis Ulanov, is accused of fraud and money laundering, both crimes committed in particular pro…
The Shor Party Deputy’s Case in the Billion-Dollar Bank Fraud was Sent to Court

BREAKING NEWS: President Maia Sandu Appointed Natalia Gavrilița to the Prime Minister Position

President Maia Sandu signed the decree appointing Natalia Gavrilița to the position of prime minister after the Action and Solidarity Party proposed her as their candidate for the prime minister position. Gavri…
BREAKING NEWS: President Maia Sandu Appointed Natalia Gavrilița to the Prime Minister Position

Constitutional Court Declares Unconstitutional the Socialist-Shor Decision by which the US Embassy was Deprived of a Land for Constructing a Diplomatic Complex

The Constitutional Court declared on Thursday, July 29, unconstitutional the amendments made by the Socialist-Shor parties that blocked the transfer of the Republican Stadium ground in use to the Embassy of the…
Constitutional Court Declares Unconstitutional the Socialist-Shor Decision by which the US Embassy was Deprived of a Land for Constructing a Diplomatic Complex

A Socialist Deputy Oblige by Court to Publicly Apologize and Pay 1,000 Euros after Accusing the Presidential Adviser on Health of Having a Fake Master’s Diploma

Socialist deputy Alla Darovannaia was obliged by the Chișinău Court to apologize publicly and pay 1,000 euros for damage to the presidential adviser on health, Ala Nemerenco for spreading the fake information t…
A Socialist Deputy Oblige by Court to Publicly Apologize and Pay 1,000 Euros after Accusing the Presidential Adviser on Health of Having a Fake Master’s Diploma

Five Employees of a Construction Company were Put on Trial after Producing Damages of over 2 Million Euros to 56 Investors

Five former employees of a construction company were put on trial after 56 investors in a building lost over 2 million euros. The defendants are accused of fraud, embezzlement of foreign property, abuse of offi…
Five Employees of a Construction Company were Put on Trial after Producing Damages of over 2 Million Euros to 56 Investors