Maia’s Debate or Dodon’s Deviation?

Maia’s Debate or Dodon’s Deviation?
14 November 2020 | 19:03

The 2020 Moldova presidential debates between Maia Sandu and Igor Dodon, the major candidates in the presidential election, didn’t take place. Depressing autumn weather, coronavirus pandemic,  country’s poverty- who needs debates in such conditions? It’s as if we haven’t all heard, dozens of times, what is each of them supposed to say? This is the vision for the last round of presidential debates this year.

There is a growing body of opinion that debates should be prescribed by law. Debates mean access to information about candidates and define their respective positions. This is one of the main reasons why debates should be legislatively mandated.

This year there was no presidential debate in Moldova. Let’s assume that the debate did take place. It would look worse and more dramatically than it was in  the 2016 debate between the same two presidential candidates. First, Dodon would show off his male sexual supremacy, alluding to Sandu’s marital status and lack of children. He would then poke fun at her studies at Harvard University and make jokes about her experience in several important offices in Washington. Finally, he would attack her unscrupulously with his favorite manipulations: LGBTQ and unionism with Romania, covering himself from top to bottom in the piety of a president who walked around Mount Athos. 

 Igor Dodon would have allegedly attacked Maia Sandu unorthodoxly in a debate. She decided to become president, show resilience, and show society her ability to respond under pressure. Human beings love the instant reactions in unpredictable situations. Following this, not only presidential candidates but also parliamentarians, ministers, mayors should be subjected to such an attempt at spontaneity.

The debates also highlighted Maia Sandu’s ability to ask questions. Here, the list had to be large and heavy: about corruption, lack of judicial reforms, huge expenditures, lack of official reports, one-billion-dollar theft. However, Igor Dodon’s answers would have been the ones he has been shouting constantly for the last four years: “That’s all”, “I don’t remember”, “Don’t deal with fakes”. All this, mixed with sexist attacks, naughty jokes, disgusting approaches, and degrading allusions. Moreover, there is the propaganda machine: owning pro-Russian television channels, webpages, armies of trolls on social networks to have diverted the public’s attention from the non-answers regarding corruption to sexist approaches and that would be all that was left to the Moldovan society.

Why did not Maia Sandu accept the debate, though? Was her refusal proof of weakness or a skillful step to get around the mud throwers? Though, a more significant question for all of the Moldovan citizens: How did we, as a society, get to this point where poorly educated people, with limited professional experience, full of contradictions and corruption, with the resume filled with immorality, ruled almost everything in this state? Should we confront them in public talks, lower our standards to the level of their illiteracy, let them drag us through the mud instead of answering our questions? How do we land in such situations?

Should the Moldovan society give up debate? Not in any way. We need to turn the debates into a platform where issues of the most significant public interest are discussed and, where it is punishable to ridicule public affairs through insinuation, speculation, and use of the electorate fears against certain topics that we have been intoxicated with for 30 years.

The ideal debate would be one in which only investigative journalists ask questions, and the debate is broadcast live on all TV channels, including oligarchic and candidate-controlled ones, but primarily on public television.

AUTHOR MAIL

 .

INVESTIGATION: What is Prosecutor General Alexandr Stoianoglo Accused Of? Details of the Five Parts of the Claim for which the Suspended Prosecutor General was Detained

Alexandr Stoianoglo, the suspended Prosecutor General who has been placed under house arrest for the next 30 days, is being prosecuted for five parts of the claim. According to anti-corruption prosecutor Victor…
INVESTIGATION: What is Prosecutor General Alexandr Stoianoglo Accused Of? Details of the Five Parts of the Claim for which the Suspended Prosecutor General was Detained

EDITORIAL: The Political Treaty With Russia: What’s the Use of It?

Moscow perceives the Chișinău-Moscow relations, which have been on the agenda of the Action and Solidarity Party since the beginning of the mandate, differently from Chișinău. Full of controversy and dissonance…
EDITORIAL: The Political Treaty With Russia: What’s the Use of It?

EDITORIAL: Who Dies From the Vaccine?

No, we won’t all die from COVID-19. Even the unvaccinated will not all die from this virus. That’s what specialists, researchers, and epidemiologists say and I believe them. Annually, the most important c…
EDITORIAL: Who Dies From the Vaccine?

OPINION POOL: Does Moldova Need Another General Prosecutor? What Kind of Prosecutor?

On October 5, General Prosecutor Alexandr Stoianoglo was suspended from office and remanded in custody, and a criminal case was filed against him. Stoianoglo is charged with several serious crimes, including ab…
OPINION POOL: Does Moldova Need Another General Prosecutor? What Kind of Prosecutor?

The Head of the EU Delegation in Chișinău, Janis Mazeiks, Welcomed the Decision of Moldova to Join the States that Ratified the Istanbul Convention

The head of the European Union Delegation in Chișinău Janis Mazeiks welcomed the decision of Moldova to join the states that have ratified the Istanbul Convention and mentioned that with the implementation of t…
The Head of the EU Delegation in Chișinău, Janis Mazeiks, Welcomed the Decision of Moldova to Join the States that Ratified the Istanbul Convention

Former Deputy Minister of Interior Risks Losing 20,000 Euros after the National Integrity Authority Initiated a Control of His Wealth Due to a ZdG Investigation

Ion Țurcan, former Deputy Minister of Interior and former president of Criuleni district, risks losing 20,000 euros after the National Integrity Authority initiated the control of his wealth in April this year…
Former Deputy Minister of Interior Risks Losing 20,000 Euros after the National Integrity Authority Initiated a Control of His Wealth Due to a ZdG Investigation